tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7172467666615264811.post7986294048797013590..comments2022-03-27T12:39:22.052-07:00Comments on 經數學堂博客(解答經濟數學問題)(停止更新): 2014 經濟 MC Q1 曼聯發現球場水浸,繼續踢機會成本會唔會變?Ronald Chikhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00369938068297303839noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7172467666615264811.post-91569978263654803122018-09-22T09:11:09.590-07:002018-09-22T09:11:09.590-07:00機會成本有一part係risk
機會成本有一part係risk<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05325433159689434661noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7172467666615264811.post-80971984618636205502017-02-01T00:04:26.997-08:002017-02-01T00:04:26.997-08:00應該係成個機會成本改變左,價值最高唔再係去海洋公園應該係成個機會成本改變左,價值最高唔再係去海洋公園Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7172467666615264811.post-54433027273790457062016-12-10T21:24:59.982-08:002016-12-10T21:24:59.982-08:00唔係好明。機會成本既定議係眾多放棄的選擇之中,價值最高的(假設曼聯唔踢波會去海洋公園玩)。受傷機會大...唔係好明。機會成本既定議係眾多放棄的選擇之中,價值最高的(假設曼聯唔踢波會去海洋公園玩)。受傷機會大左,繼續踢點解會令到去海洋公園既價值大左?<br /><br />同埋三文治既例子都唔係好明。假設機會成本係食燒賣,發現有蟑螂會令到三文治價值下跌,但應該唔會令食燒賣既價值上升?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com